Are we prone to repeat our past mistakes or will we finally reign in big techs?
23 February 2024
By Newton Braga
How countries are trying to reign in big techs dominance and legislate to improve tech governance, competitiveness, consumer rights and privacy
Technology transforms every aspect of our lives, from how we communicate, work, learn, create, and consume. However, the rapid pace and scale of technological innovation also pose significant challenges for regulators, who need to balance the benefits and risks of technology, while ensuring fair competition, consumer protection, data privacy, and cybersecurity. With quick advances in some areas such as artificial intelligence there is a growing concerns to reign in the power of tech companies, not falling in the same mistakes made in the advent of the internet, e-commerce, social media and other big tech developments. In this article, we will briefly explore some of the major tech laws, regulations, and initiatives that have been passed or proposed in different countries and regions, focusing on four key areas: artificial intelligence (AI), platforms, data, and cybersecurity.
Artificial intelligence
AI is one of the most disruptive and promising technologies of our time, with applications ranging from health care and education to entertainment and finance. However, AI also raises ethical, social, and legal questions, such as how to ensure accountability, transparency, fairness, safety, and human oversight of AI systems.
Several countries and regions have developed or are developing frameworks and guidelines to govern the development and use of AI, based on common principles such as human dignity, human rights, democracy, and the rule of law. For example, the European Union (EU) has proposed the Artificial Intelligence Act, which aims to create a single market for trustworthy and human-centric AI in the EU. The Act would classify AI systems according to their risk level, and impose different obligations and prohibitions on high-risk AI systems, such as biometric identification, critical infrastructure, and...
[More]
Posted at: 10:05 PM | 0 Comments | Add Comment
Four-Day Working Week - Would It Work For Your Organisation?
6 November 2023
By Newton Braga
The 4-day working week has been gaining momentum in recent years as more companies are experimenting with it. Some of the reasons why companies might want to adopt the 4-day working week include:
- Increased productivity and employee engagement: According to a study by Microsoft Japan, productivity increased by almost 40% during a trial period of a four-day workweek. Similarly, Perpetual Guardian, a New Zealand-based firm that manages trusts, wills, and estates, found that enabling staff to work four days a week and be paid for the regular five was so successful in the trial that they hoped to make the change official. According to Perpetual Guardian, staff were more inventive, their engagement was better, their effectiveness in the workplace increased, they were all on time, and nobody left early or took extended breaks.
- Improved recruitment and retention of top talent: A four-day workweek can be an attractive perk for employees and can help companies attract and retain top talent.
- Less commuting and eco-friendliness: A shorter workweek can reduce commuting time and costs for employees, which can lead to less traffic congestion and lower carbon emissions.
However, such change is not suitable to every organisation, with some reasons why companies might not want to adopt the 4-day working week including:
- It is not applicable to every industry: A four-day working week may not be suitable for every industry or type of job. For instance, some jobs may require employees to be available on weekends or outside of regular business hours and in front line roles.
- Morale boosts may be fleeting: While a four-day working week may initially boost morale among employees, this effect may not last over time, impacting collaboration, teamwork, knowledge sharing and efficiency.
- Compromised stress levels: A shorter working week may lead to increased stress levels...
[More]
Posted at: 08:46 PM | 0 Comments | Add Comment
The Crucial Role and Reimagining of Middle Managers in Modern Organisations
22 July 2023
By Newton Braga
Introduction Middle managers have long been the subject of negative stereotypes, portrayed as bureaucratic, ineffectual, and disconnected from both senior executives and front-line employees. However, the reality is far from these caricatures. In today's dynamic business environment, middle managers play a pivotal and necessary role in driving organisational success. They serve as the vital link between the strategic vision set by top executives and the execution on the ground by front-line employees. This article explores the importance of middle management, the reasons behind its bad reputation, the challenges faced by middle managers, and ways to empower them to be more effective in their roles.
The Critical Role of Middle Managers Middle managers are a central cohesive source of support and stability of organisational effectiveness. They act as translators, bridging the gap between high-level strategy and on-the-ground execution. They cascade the strategic vision down to their teams, ensuring alignment and clarity of purpose. Without their guidance and support, front-line employees may struggle to understand how their work contributes to the organisation's broader goals.
To succeed, middle managers must have the ability to think about how they can accelerate value, to identify which risks and barriers they need to remove or mitigate so the teams can improve efficiency, deliver to the business needs and strategic goals. Middle managers these days must be able to “helicopter up and down”. Helicopter up to see the view high up, to work close with the executive team, and then helicopter down with their teams, with the people in the front line, on the ground, to engage deeply in problem solving and adding value.
Moreover, middle managers are not just administrators; they are key players in talent development, team-building, problem-solving, and information gathering. They possess valuable insights into both employee sentiment and organisational operations,...
[More]
Posted at: 01:32 PM | 0 Comments | Add Comment
Layoff in the Tech Industry
21 March 2023
By Newton Braga
Following the COVID pandemic, when many big tech companies increased their staff number to support an increase in demand, 2022 proved to be a year where reality bit, and the same companies had to start looking in reducing their staff back as the demand for product and services experienced through the pandemic times did not continue to eventuate.
In 2022, 1051 tech companies laid off over 160,000 employees. The layoff rounds with the largest number of employees losing their jobs in 2022 were:
- Meta – 11,000 employees laid off in 09/11/2022.
- Amazon – 10,000 employees laid off in 16/11/2022.
- Cisco – 4,100 employees laid off in 16/11/2022.
- Philips – 4,000 employees laid off in 24/10/2022.
- Twitter – 3,700 employees laid off in 04/11/2022.
Following this first round of companies’ cutbacks in their number of staff, the first three months of 2023 seem to be a sign of layoffs to continue through this year. And if the beginning of 2023 proves to be just the top of the iceberg, as many analysts described the current state of the IT employment market, tech employees worldwide should be prepared for more uncertainty.
At the time of writing this article at the end of the third week of March/2023, 505 tech companies had laid off a total of 148,180 employees in 2023. Making the top of list in terms of number of employees losing their job, including the layoff date, we have:
- Google – 12,000 employees in 20/01/2023.
- Meta – 10,000 employees in 14/03/2023.
- Microsoft – 10,000 employees in 18/01/2023.
- Amazon – 8,000 employees in 04/01/2023, followed by 9,000 more in 20/03/2023.
- Ericson – 8,500 employees in 24/02/2023.
- Salesforce – 8,000 employees in 04/01/2023.
- Dell – 6,650 employees in...
[More]
Posted at: 01:31 AM | 0 Comments | Add Comment
Blockchain technology: hype or reality?
2 January 2023
By Newton Braga
Blockchain technology has been described for long time as having the potential to revolutionise a wide range of industries, from finance and healthcare to supply chain management and real estate. However, despite the hype surrounding blockchain, it is important to understand that not all use cases are equally feasible or practical.
One of the main benefits of blockchain is its ability to provide a secure and transparent record of transactions. This makes it well-suited for use cases where trust and transparency are important, such as supply chain management or even voting systems. For example, a company could use a blockchain to track the movement of goods from the manufacturer to the consumer, providing a tamper-proof record of the journey. Similarly, a government could use a blockchain to conduct elections, ensuring that the results are accurate and cannot be altered.
Some claimed successful blockchain use cases across a variety of industries are:
- Supply chain management: Blockchain can be used to track the movement of goods from the manufacturer to the consumer, providing a transparent and tamper-proof record of the journey. One successful example of this is IBM's Food Trust, which uses blockchain to track the movement of food from farm to store. This helps to ensure that food is safe and reduces the risk of outbreaks of foodborne illness.
- Real estate: Blockchain can be used to securely and transparently record property ownership and transactions. This can streamline the process of buying and selling property and reduce the risk of fraud. One successful example of this is Propy, a company that uses blockchain to facilitate the buying and selling of real estate.
- Healthcare: Blockchain can be used to securely and transparently record and share medical records. This can improve the efficiency of the healthcare system and reduce...
[More]
Tags:
bitcoin, blockchain, techhype, technology
Posted at: 08:55 PM | 0 Comments | Add Comment
Brazil’s General Data Protection Law (or LGPD) vs EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
28 September 2022
By Newton Braga
In face of the Optus cyber-attack in Australia in September 2022, the discussion about a broader data protection legislation in the country emerged again. Analysts, privacy advocates and cyber professionals question the existing legislation in place, with some recommending more restricting laws and higher fines are necessary to ensure organisations implement better practices and properly manage data security and privacy issues. Two legislations could be a good reference and guideline to improve Australian data privacy / protection legislation.
The first one is the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which is considered one of the toughest privacy and security legislation around the world. It imposes obligations onto organisations anywhere, as long as they target or collect data related to people in the European Union (EU). It came into effect on May 25, 2018.
Another one is the Brazilian General Data Protection Law (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados, or LGPD), passed by the National Congress of Brazil on 14th August 2018. Coming into on 15th August 2020, the LGPD attempted to unify over 40 different status governing personal data in Brazil, creating a legal framework for the use of personal data in Brazil, online and offline, in the private and public sectors.
The GDPR and LGPD have some similarities. The LGPD applies to any business or organisation that processes the personal data of people in Brazil, regardless of where that business or organisation is located. The GDPR protects the data of EU’S citizens and residents, even if it is transferred outside the EU zone, which means that the GDPR applies to all organisations EU and non-EU, which process the personal information of European citizens.
Although the LGPD does not present a single definition for personal data, the legislative text in various places defines...
[More]
Tags:
dataprivacy, gdpr, lgpd
Posted at: 10:47 AM | 0 Comments | Add Comment
Investing in digital in times of recession
9 August 2022
By Newton Braga
With the increase of inflation around the world, several recent economic forecasts identify an increase in the probability of a recession in different parts of the world.
According to a Bloomberg survey of economists, the median probability of a recession in USA over the following 12 months is 47.5%, when it was 30% in June. With Italy’s renewed political trouble, the EU’s looming gas crisis, JPMorgan has warned the block will be pushed into a mild recession by early 2023, limiting the ability of the European Central Bank to hike interest rate. Analysts expect the UK will face a 15-month recession soon, deepening UK’s economic crisis as they are facing an increase in the cost of living while inflation up to hit 13%. In addition, although Australia can avoid a recession, the Reserve Bank of Australia anticipates that the economy will grow slower than it has in a non-recessionary period, growing by only 1.75% in 2023 and 2024.
In such global economic circumstances, Chief Information Officers (CIOs) around the world must continue to invest, accelerating the right digital initiatives within an organisation, while facing an environment characterised by higher inflation, scarce and costly information technology (IT) talent and constrained in global suppliers. As the COVID brought some sort of pandemic-forced digitalisation, investing now, in difficult financial times, in the right digital programs can give an organisation a long-term competitive advantage while avoiding the negative effects of economic pressures in the short term.
Opportunities to reduce the costs of doing business can lead to automating business processes, an investment which will bring permanent cost reduction to an organisation. Investing in new technologies such artificial intelligence, robotics and machine learning can help to reduce labour costs while freeing up scarce talent, changing workforce capabilities, to focus on activities...
[More]
Tags:
cfo, cio, digital, investment, recession
Posted at: 10:53 AM | 0 Comments | Add Comment
Great Resignation and The Loss of Tacit Knowledge
15 May 2022
By Newton Braga
The “great resignation”, a phenomenon that describes record numbers of people leaving their jobs after the COVID-19 pandemic, seems to be real and continuing – not a hype as some companies prefer to believe. In one of the largest surveys conducted so far analysing the great resignation issue, the Global Workforce Hopes and Fears Survey conducted by PwC, drawing from more than 52,000 workers across 44 countries and territories, has some interesting finding.
Workers with specialised or scarce skills are feeling empowered to test the market. Eighteen per cent of workers who responded to the PwC survey said they were very or extremely likely to switch to a new employer within the next year, with a further 32% stating they were moderately likely to switch. One in six (16%) expected to leave the workforce temporarily or permanently.
The results are a wake-up call to organisational leaders. Retaining workers will require more than a pay increase, as employees start to consider other matters such as having a fulfilling work, concerns about environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues and how their work can impact them and also the pursue of a more flexible, family friend work environment.
Employees can be a force multiplier or a detractor and to have an understanding of their workplace can help leaders to energise the workforce to achieve organisational mission, bolder strategies and goals. With companies operating in an increased polarised world, 65% of employees responding to the PwC survey said they discussed frequently or sometimes political and social issues. The numbers are higher still among self-reported ethnic minorities (73%) and younger employees (69% among those ages 26 to 41, 13 percentage points higher than for those ages 58 to 76).
While the loss of skilled employees is recognised as an extra cost...
[More]
Posted at: 11:59 AM | 0 Comments | Add Comment
Institutionalising workplace changes made due to COVID
19 March 2022
By Newton Braga
Organisations had been dealing with volatility and some unpredictability for decades well before the COVID pandemic taking place more than two years ago. The pre-pandemic changes in the way companies operated, alongside the digital transformation in the workplace and the raise of start-up disruptors, led to many organisations failing to keep up with.
While many organisations had aspects of agility and preparation for the future somehow present inside them, few could claim to be prepared for the level of adaptability necessary to thrive during the pandemic. The pandemic inherent challenges broke almost everything, from supply chains to customer interactions and the way employees worked. But it also offered business and other organisations the opportunity to embrace changes which they were not prepared to go through, insisting in old ways of working that were not ideal for them. Companies that promptly embraced the changes due to the pandemic and made them permanent new ways of working, demonstrated an ability to thrive during the pandemic.
In a recent podcast, Keith Ferrazzi, founder of the consulting firm, Ferrazzi Greenlight, and the lead author of the book, “Competing in the New World of Work: How Radical Adaptability Separates the Best from the Rest”, mentioned about a research they conducted with 2000 executive in organisations that succeed, thrive or just survived during the pandemic.
The research identified that resilience, previously seen as an individual trait, was one of one of the key critical team trait, leading organisations to thrive, to have better engagement scores, less reported mental stress, stronger mental resilience. A team resilience meant the team members worked together to identify and raise each member level of energy to lead the team to succeed. One way identified to maintain the level of a team resilience was conducting a monthly energy check....
[More]
Posted at: 08:57 PM | 0 Comments | Add Comment
WEF Global Risks Report 2022 Highlights
17 January 2022
By Newton Braga
As we entered 2022, global society continues to experience the economic and social consequences of COVID-19, as it still poses as a critical threat to the world. The Global Risks Report 2022, 17th Edition, published by the World Economic Forum, presents the results of the latest Global Risks Perception Survey (GPRS) which gathered insights from nearly 1,000 global experts and leaders.
The report highlights the risks of the global vaccine inequality – the poorest 52 countries, hosting 20% of the global population, only 6% of the population has been vaccinated at the time of the release of the report – and how it can create global divergence, increases cross border tensions and pose as a threat to the world economy recovery – it is expected that by 2024 advanced economies will be 0.9% above their pre-pandemic expected GDP growth, while developing economies will have fallen by 5.5% below it.
Only 16% of the GPRS respondents feel positive and optimistic about the future outlook for the world while 11% believe the global recovery will accelerate.
Technological risks were also identified by the survey’s respondents as short and medium-term threats to the world, including digital inequality and cybersecurity failure. Responding to a question on driving international risk mitigation efforts, the respondents identified the areas of trade facilitation, international crime and weapons of mass destruction as receiving proper and effective mitigation efforts. They also identified areas where risk mitigation efforts fall short of the challenge, with such areas include artificial intelligence, space exploitation, cross-border cyberattacks, global and localised misinformation and migration and refugees.
With the spike in COVID-19 towards the end of 2021, the pandemic continues to make difficult the countries’ ability to facilitate a sustained recovery. With a weak outlook, the global economy was identified as expecting to be...
[More]
Posted at: 10:34 AM | 0 Comments | Add Comment
|
|
|